|
Listen to the reports each weekday at 6:49 am & 8:49 am To suggest a topic for a future land use report, or to convey a comment, please use this link. |
| Past
Reports
The following Land Use Reports have been presented on KUSP by Gary Patton, Executive Director of The Planning and Conservation League. The opinions expressed by Mr. Patton are not necessarily those of KUSP Radio, nor of any of its sponsors. |
|
Monday, March 13, 2006 – The State Infrastructure Bond So how are we doing, as a “California community,” on a statewide basis, as our elected officials debate and discuss what may be the largest single borrowing proposal in the history of the State? From my point of view, I could be a lot happier. Last Friday night, the State Senate failed to pass a proposal (in the form of Assembly Bill 134) that would have authorized something like $30 billion dollars of borrowing. No Republican voted for the bill because the Governor sent “deal points” to the Senate, demanding new uneconomic dams, a rollback of environmental protections, and a reduction of funding for parks, open space, and coastal and marine protection. I think protecting our environment is central to our long term happiness, and I’m sorry the Governor apparently disagrees! More Information Tuesday, March 14, 2006 – Housing: Scotts Valley and Arroyo Grande In Scotts Valley, tomorrow night, the City Council is considering an innovative policy that might stimulate more affordable housing in that community. In the City of Arroyo Grande, in San Luis Obispo County, as part of an appeal from a Planning Commission decision, the City Council will decide tonight whether or not to allow some second floor apartments to be constructed that might provide at least a few affordable housing opportunities that wouldn’t otherwise exist. Please send me your comments and suggestions. More Information
City of Arroyo Grande Website – http://www.arroyogrande.org/ Arroyo Grande Agenda Materials – http://www.arroyogrande.org/admin/meeting-materials.php City of Scotts Valley Website – http://www.scottsvalley.org/ City of Scotts Valley Agenda Materials - http://www.scottsvalley.org/cca.pdf Wednesday, March 15, 2006 – The State Transportation Commission What is of specific concern to the “Campaign for Sensible Transportation” today is the proposal to widen a portion of Highway One, in Santa Cruz County, from Morrissey Boulevard to Soquel Avenue. This is, they argue, part of a larger project that was rejected by local voters, and so the project shouldn’t be build piecemeal. In addition, a Transportation Funding Task Force with about 100 members will have its first meeting on March 23rd, and this state action might preempt that local process. More Information Thursday, March 16, 2006 – Monterey County Transportation Funding The Transportation Agency for Monterey County (TAMC for short) is a local transportation funding agency, with jurisdiction limited to Monterey County. The most significant thing now going on, in terms of transportation funding, is probably a proposed sales tax measure, to be used to fund new highway and other projects. You can get information from the TAMC website, and I’ve put a link to that website in the transcript for today’s Land Use Report. Finding out more about this proposed sales tax increase should probably be a “class assignment” for Monterey County residents who are serious about learning what’s happening in the land use policy world. Since the sales tax election is in June, there will be ample opportunity for me to provide a suggested “reading list.” For today’s assignment, I’d like to invite Monterey County residents to review a so-called “Nexus Study for a Regional Development Impact Fee.” It’s a 129-page document, and is also found on the TAMC website. It has some significant bearing on the proposed “Butterfly Village” project, which is phase one of the Rancho San Juan development proposal. The most critical impacts of Rancho San Juan are on the Highway 101 corridor between Prunedale and Salinas. The Nexus Study seems to demonstrate that those impacts will not be alleviated within the next twenty years, even if the sales tax increase is enacted and a regional development fee is imposed. More Information
TAMC Website - http://www.tamcmonterey.org/ California Transportation Commission (CTC) Website – http://www.catc.ca.gov/ Agenda for March 15th-16th CTC meeting - http://www.catc.ca.gov/meetings/agenda/06Agenda/06Mar/0306_Final.pdf TAMC Nexus Study - http://www.tamcmonterey.org/prog_devimpfee/pdf/NEXUS_5-04.pdf Friday, March 17, 2006 – Green Building On the “top down” side, though, the state is making at least “baby steps” towards “green building” in state construction projects. The proposed infrastructure bond didn’t contain a “mandate,” but did highlight the benefits of “green building” in new educational facilities to be constructed with state funds. For KUSP, this is Gary Patton. More Information You can get the full text of AB 134 (the proposed infrastructure bond bill) on the state’s legislative information website - http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/. The “green building” language is quoted below: SEC. 13. Section 17261 of the Education Code is amended to read: 17261. The State Allocation Board shall obtain construction plans for school buildings appropriate for school districts in various climates and geographical conditions of the state. The plans shall be composed of plans designed to meet the needs of school districts requiring school buildings of various sizes. The plans may include landscape suggestions. The plans may include designs that promote the efficient use of energy and water, the maximum use of natural lighting and indoor air quality, the use of recycled materials and materials that emit a minimum of toxic substances, the use of acoustics conducive to teaching and learning, and other characteristics of high performance schools.
|